Subject | Re: Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths |
From | Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@xxxxxxxx> |
Date | Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:21:44 +0200 |
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 19:04:14 +0200, Ronald van der Pol wrote: > I like to hear other opinions. A similar issue was raised in the OGF NML working group: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nml-wg/2008-September/000175.html So maybe urn:ogf:... is the way to go. Any other opinions about the Global Identifiers proposal? rvdp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- From: Freek Dijkstra
- Re: Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- References:
- Re: [GLIF all] proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- From: Ronald van der Pol
- Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- From: Freek Dijkstra
- Re: Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- From: Ronald van der Pol
- Re: [GLIF all] proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- Prev by Date: [Fwd: [nsi-bof] Confirmation of interim NSI meeting Seattle]
- Next by Date: Re: Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- Next by thread: Re: Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths
- Index(es):