Subject |
Re: proposal for the introduction of Global Identifiers for lightpaths |
From |
Freek Dijkstra <fdijkstr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date |
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:22:28 +0200 |
[resent; somehow my message didn't get through]
Hi Ronald, Lars, Tom and Thomas,
Good to see a common schema. Thanks for creating this draft!
If URNs are to be used, the name must be registered by IANA:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/
Unfortunately, the registration process requires "IETF consensus action".
As I see it, there are four options:
1. Use URNs, and register urn:glif: at IANA (and thus go to the IETF)
2. Use URNs, without official IANA registration (which undermines the
role of IANA)
3. Use an "unofficial" URN, e.g. urn-1:gif:, which only has a very
light-weight registration process ("two week review on urn-nid list")
4. Use URIs.
I think option 2 is very undesirable, and option 1 is too official at
this moment (GLIF is not a standardization body as I see it). So I would
recommend option 3 or 4.
Regards,
Freek Dijkstra